I agree with what I heard you say about the cellulosic thing. It's probably the way we need to go long term, but the technology is not clear yet, and we're not sure whether it's one year or forty years out for that. Brazil produces ethanol from sugar cane with an 8:1 energy ratio. Close to the 1:1 that we see with corn or wheat looks a little inefficient compared to that.
My concern—and the concern of most cattle producers in Alberta—has to do with having to compete with a steady stream of government dollars. I want to emphasize that I don't want to rain on the grain farmers' parade, because they have needed a break for a long time, but I want to talk about the long term. If the livestock sectors have to compete with government dollars long term, it's going to put them at a disadvantage, and we'll trade one value-added industry for another value-added industry, which, as we discussed before, has perhaps questionable environmental benefits.