I think you're right. We had a strategy, and we dealt with it at the time, but let's remember that we still have 100% of capacity. Why are we killing at a 70% level? It's because we have some very significant things going on.
We have a very extreme labour shortage in the hottest market in Canada, where the majority of our packers are. There simply aren't enough people to go around, unless we're prepared to lower our prices considerably to some level. I don't know what level it would have to be at for them to pay the kinds of wages to be able to track that kind of labour. We're in a short-term problem.
Secondly, we have yet to open up some of those high-valued export markets that allow us to be competitive. Remember, we're into some markets, but the U.S. is into many more markets. We're 60% dependent on trade, and they're about 20% dependent on trade. We still have some recovery to do there, but I think those things are there.
Thirdly, we've asked our industry to take on some additional costs. The U.S., through NAFTA, is our competitor. What's particularly coming up and staring us in the face now is this whole feed ban enhancement probability.
On the food security issue, my answer to you would simply be this. Again, food security in Canada is not likely going to resonate very far, considering that we're the fifth largest exporter in the world. We tell some of the protectionist countries we trade with that the best source of food security they have for Korea and Japan, for example, is to have their borders open to as many countries as possible that can supply them with product.
I think our question is this. How do we raise the value of the other markets that we're dependent on to keep agriculture viable? I don't think it's the Canadian domestic market.