This is my last question. In regard to WTO, you mentioned that the government must negotiate on behalf of all Canadian farmers. All parties supported the motion. Our government is saying it wants to protect supply management, so it's not putting it on the table, but does it not mean that once you put something on the table there have to be concessions? Would there not be a danger, then, of losing what we have so far in our supply management sector, because this is not the rationale for saying, “No, we won't negotiate it”? I don't quite understand what that means.