Okay.
If I could add, on your question on different disaster insurance, from our industry perspective, because supply management is what it is, a strong case can't necessarily be made for market insurance. But I'm concerned that producers don't have adequate coverage for disasters.
As a farmer, whether it's 60-40, 90-10, or 100%, I really don't care. It's public money that should go to the producers, but it's important. In particular, smaller provinces that rely heavily on agriculture are at a real disadvantage on the 60-40 split. For example, at a minimum, federal dollars shouldn't be tied up waiting for provincial dollars, in my view. If you can't get the perfect scenario, the federal dollars should minimally flow.