If we could use a couple of very good examples, the BSE crisis in Canada and the avian influenza that struck B.C., the only way to compensate a lot of producers was through the current BRM funding.
Those very crisis-specific and regional issues—well, BSE wasn't regional—are very hard to address with current BRM programming like CAIS, crop insurance, and production insurance. Other very regional and very local weather issues happen sometimes, and it's probably hard to address the need and the hurt under current BRM programming. It's not conducive to maintaining a good production margin. It's not conducive to maintaining insurance levels, previous histories, and things like that. Those things should be dealt with as disasters, and the funding should be there and separate from BRM for that disaster programming.
Does that answer your question?