It's a matter of appreciation. I believe we have a fair bit of political influence in agriculture. I don't want to be pretentious. This concept of food sovereignty, which we were talking about earlier, is one in which each of the products or each of the regions of the world should first be able to be self-sufficient and where there would be a surplus market and a regional market that is deficient in a given type of production. This concept is relatively easy to sell in the global agricultural world. Marketing organization is also relatively easy to sell. It doesn't necessarily have to be a copy of what's being done in Quebec, but a form of market organization, the provision of products to the local consumer is being developed in all kinds of countries. UPADI has gone to prepare work sites, projects in Latin America and Africa, and has had good success in organizing local marketing.
So I think that, despite the fact that we are a small number of agricultural producers relative to the total number of producers in the world, our organization nevertheless has fairly good political influence outside our borders. If that was the question, the answer is yes.