Our concern right now is the principle. We're dealing with two principles in terms of the federal government's action on the Wheat Board that I think really should be of concern to you. It relates to the agricultural policy framework that we're discussing: will orderly marketing be allowed, and is it a business risk management tool? The government has really moved in the direction that individual choice is what matters, not collective choice. That's what's happened under the government's strategy in the Canadian Wheat Board. I wonder if you might comment on that. What we're seeing there is that whereas producers have always had the collective choice of marketing under the Canadian Wheat Board, now it's going to revert to individual choice. If one seller wants to market outside that system, it really brings down the whole system. That's a concern to us, and I would like your comments on that.
Secondly, to the UPA, Mr. Vigneault, I just want your further comments on this. You said there's an effort to move to diversification within the industry at the farm level, but other programs are jeopardizing that move to diversification. Are you meaning the CAIS program in terms of its all-farm, whole-farm approach, or are you meaning other programs?
Those are my two questions.