I don't know if I can answer that last question, but with respect to your question about the appeal on corn, both Canada and the U.S. retain their rights to use trade remedy measures. Canada, over the last decade, has taken actions against the United States, and vice versa. In the case of grain corn, there was a finding by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal that U.S. imports were not injuring the domestic industry, so that case was dropped. I understand, however, that the U.S. has proceeded to appeal the finding of the Canada Border Services Agency respecting subsidies in that case. That's their right to do.
Both governments use a chapter 19 process under NAFTA quite frequently in trade remedy cases, so it's not an unusual step. The only thing unusual here is the fact that the case has been dropped by Canada, and the assumption is that the U.S. government remains concerned about the way in which Canada undertook its investigation of U.S. subsidies. So that's the issue in this case.