I believe we can do that. I believe there are ways around that. We've discussed various ways in which that can be accomplished.
But talking about programming and delivery of programming and where the money goes, the most recent program announced by government was, of course, the farm options program, which has now been scuttled, for those who thought they were in the program in 2005. So we really don't know where that one is, but $170 million out of $550 million being dedicated to account is certainly not a way to deliver money to farmers.
I'm wondering whether we should look at some of the other programs we delivered, CAIS being one of them, because it was very unpredictable and certainly there was a huge cost involved in getting the money to people--and of course the clawbacks in some cases. Surely we can learn from some of these systems.
I'm also wondering whether one government delivery would not be a better way of delivering, rather than having eleven governments trying to deliver money to farmers. There is one farm bill for the United States. Maybe we should take some lessons from the United States.