On the matter of replacement scientists and people, you're replacing 17 at the moment. I'm not sure where you're going in terms of further replacement, but you mentioned that you lose 25 or 35 people--I forget the number--each year. I just have to wonder if we have a pattern here of ultimately reducing the total number. Or how does that fit? We're only replacing half of what we're losing. Or did I misunderstand the context of the question?
On May 10th, 2007. See this statement in context.