Maybe I can deal with the grumbling, Mr. Chair, just by reading out the results: 37.5% want the Canadian Wheat Board to retain the single desk; 48.4% said they would like an option to market their barley either to the Wheat Board or somebody else--that doesn't say the Wheat Board's gone or anything like that, in spite of what Mr. Easter wants to make out of it--and 14% said they don't think the Wheat Board should have a role in the marketing of barley.
Those are the results. However you add them up, 48.4% said they want the option of marketing their barley to the Wheat Board or outside the Wheat Board, so that's where we're at with that. Obviously, as you've seen in the last couple of minutes, people want to interpret those numbers differently, but those are what the numbers are.
So that's a bit of a discussion about the letter and the contents of it, and just a bit of a rebuttal specifically on the letter. Actually, I'd like to probably come back a little later to talk about what the government has done over the past year in order to bring the barley plebiscite to the conclusion it has, but I'm certainly willing to turn it over to somebody else.