Again, there are some standards in Canada that Parliament has given us that are different from standards that Congress has given the U.S. EPA. That's outside my authority to change, and it's outside the authority of my colleague in the U.S. EPA.
What we've committed to do is to say that anything that's within our sphere of authority, we'll address. In terms of international regulatory cooperation and harmonization, the agriculture sector is an example that sees all the benefits of harmonization. Some health and environmental people would be concerned that if we have to adjust standards, we might adjust them down, and in the States they would ask whether, in adjusting standards, you're adjusting them down.
The finding is typically that when you work collaboratively internationally, you both migrate to the higher standard, and neither of you moves down. I know from talking with many of the scientists who are actually involved in doing the joint reviews with their colleagues that they find it very helpful to have the direct conversation with other expert scientists who have looked at the same data. So there are lots of benefits to us from working in a harmonized fashion.