It's really beneficial to have the discussions directly with my U.S. colleagues. When we have the NAFTA meetings, Jim Jones, who's director of the EPA's office of pesticide programs, is there. They have the same issue. Americans don't want to lose their sovereignty. So we come at this from exactly the same place. We want to approve pesticides that are appropriate. We want the economic sectors such as agriculture to have the tools they need, while recognizing that we might have some different standards, whether they're environmental or something else.
If it's the Species at Risk Act in Canada and the Endangered Species Act in the States—they do have differences—you'll see a difference in pesticide approval. But it will likely be the smallest difference, whereas we are working from an historical background. I believe there was a pest control products act as early as 1927, so you're bringing together 70 years during which we weren't closely together. Now we've been working very closely in the last decade, and joint review has been a good experience in the last four or five years.