I can start, and my colleague may be able to fill in more detail.
To start at the top, globally the approach of our industry today is very much, I would say, to research and develop for commercialization what are typically referred to as reduced-risk products, ones that have a much smaller environmental footprint, are safer to human health, and biodegrade much more quickly with little or no residue at any point.
As part of that, some of those products may qualify for organic demarcation by various organic bodies. At the end of the day, from a regulatory standpoint, all pesticides--whether they're synthetic chemicals, natural chemicals, biopestide, or even some mechanical-type approaches--have to meet the world-class standards at Health Canada for health and safety. After that, if some consumers and/or some farmers choose to pursue organic production, then obviously that is their choice.
Our members are best known for our synthetic chemistries, for example, and our biotechnologies--the interesting enigma for me always is bacillus thruingiensis, which is very much an organic product that's okay for organic certification but also very much a useful tool in biotechnology--but although we're best known for synthetic technologies, our members on a global basis pursue the new technologies, whether they're biological or otherwise, in the name of pursuing better, safer products.
Peter, do you have anything to add to that?