Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I was simply going to point out that I'm a little taken aback too, that the government side wants to rewrite every single one of these rules. This is very unusual in my experience. I've been through four Parliaments where it's been the standard at every session to reconstitute the routine motions. I recognize this sheet as being the standard routine motions, but normally, one party or another will have one suggestion to make for one of the motions. Rarely do we have this whole agenda circulated because they literally want to rewrite every single clause. So maybe that explains some of the push-back you're getting from the opposition side.
I would also like to say that we're going about this in the reverse order. As a point of order, if you will, or as a point of procedure, we should be dealing with the routine motions that are circulated before every committee. If anybody has an amendment they want to make to those routine motions, one by one they can do that.
You have us going through the Conservative Party wish list, one by one, and we're put in the uncomfortable position of having to argue against your priorities, whereas, really, this committee should be dealing--