I don't want to prolong the discussion. We're going on a long time and doing semantics here. Basically, if we hadn't had the second document, we'd be through the complete document by now.
What we had previously was working. I've travelled this country three times, with this committee and once with the fisheries and oceans committee. I've never seen a meeting at which we didn't have enough people to conduct a meeting. If it's just for receiving evidence and information, it can go on regardless of whether you have the five people or not. We're not limiting ourselves by doing this.
I think we should turn back and deal with the motion that's on the table, get rid of it, and then go back to the original one. I would hope we would go back to what we had here before, because it has served us well, it will continue to serve us well, and I dare say that probably most of the committees on the Hill are working from this premise.