If you're looking at it as general competition policy, there's a concept called “innocent collusion”. In other words, nobody is claiming these people are purposely being illegal or colluding. They're not sitting down in a boardroom somewhere. But the simple outcome of the situation, the way an industry is structured or because of the concentration, or whatever it is, the evidence we can see from the output is that there is insufficient competition.
In the United States they deal with that by breaking them up. They don't accuse them of collusion; they say there's too much concentration and they're going to be broken up. In Canada, if you embrace the idea of innocent collusion with the specific goal of increasing competition, you're going to achieve a lot.