Actually there are the odd places where that's existing. There are cooperatives that buy large quantities of inputs and then sell it to their members. However, within this concentration process, we recently saw that a lot of farmers went with the newly created entities.
It should be mentioned again that in some of the new on-supply, value-chain type of engagements, we see farmers buying packages. They're not just contracting the production; they also own the contract by their inputs from the same entity. This is an emerging reality: those buying certain products want to make sure that they can participate in the process as long as possible.
That excludes some of the engagements you're probably alluding to. However, I think there's a lot of merit in it. It's not for me to sit here and say what should be happening. But when I look, for instance, at some of my colleagues in my area, they're looking for entities like FNA, which are here today. Many farmers in western Canada are members of FNA. I'm not here to advertise somebody else's engagement, but overall I think it's a valid question. It is also a sad question, because it's difficult to understand how we farmers let so much go that we used to control.