Generally we have the concerns that in setting up the mandate itself there's a support for an immature industry—or there are very many scenarios for what the industry will look like, and we don't yet know what the shape of the industry will be, even what feedstocks we will use and ultimately the impact on greenhouse gas emissions—and that the facts are contested at every point.
However, if we're then to look at the details of the bill, we would certainly be very happy to take a look. When it's time for the regulations to be set up and made, we'd be very interested to see what that looks like and, looking at Bill C-33, certainly to see if there was a way to incorporate, too, a stress not only on the adverse effects on the environment from the use of fuel or additives contained in the fuel—health effects, and so on—but that the feedstock also be considered and that this be integrated into those concerns.
Additionally, certainly we would want to see an outright prohibition on the use of genetically engineered trees as a feedstock. Also, of course, our concern is with other genetically engineered crops, but certainly the use of genetically engineered trees for cellulosic ethanol is a very serious concern for us.