I wish I had more than five minutes to answer that. There's a lot of stuff there.
On the op-ed piece, that was not a personal decision; it was a decision of senior management of the Canadian Grain Commission of which I was a part. The recommendation came to me, upon assuming my responsibilities, that an op-ed letter should be written. It was worked upon corporately by me, the other commissioners, and senior management at the Canadian Grain Commission.
There was agreement throughout the management of the organization that the letter was appropriate; it was a way of introducing me; it was a way of assuring producers that grain quality would be maintained in our grain-handling system and that the Canada Grain Act would continue to protect producers. That was the purpose of the letter, and I think it is an indicator of solid management.
What was the second part of your question?