Yes. While I'm speaking, I would like to acknowledge the fact--Guy gave me an update yesterday--that apparently there is a movement to bring in another system.
The way the motion reads doesn't preclude something else coming in at any time. I see this as a precautionary measure. If there isn't a system in place that all parties are satisfied with by August 1, then this motion allows us to wait until something is in place. Conversely, if something is in place that everybody was happy with before, this motion doesn't preclude that. It's not giving a definite date. It is the precautionary principle, and I believe we have to move very, very carefully here.
For that reason, I'm hoping the motion will get unanimous consent here at committee.