I am not satisfied with part of your answer and I would like you to clarify. You said that there is reciprocity with the US about the specified risk materials regulations, which would mean that they are implementing the same regulations as us. Have I understood correctly?
If Americans do not implement the same regulations as us and if they do not dispose of SRMs in the same manner, that gives a competitive advantage to their producers. In effect, if they do not implement the same rules, their costs are probably lower than ours and their SRMs still have some commercial value, which is not the case in our country. This would mean that our producers are at a disadvantage in relation to their American competitors. Furthermore, in the US, some SRMs can still be used to produce animal feed. It might even happen that some of that feed ends up in Canada. Am I right or not?