We are coming to the end of our discussions on this. Most people, everybody I've talked to, find it bizarre that “Product of Canada” means 51% of the cost.... People on the street think it's crazy.
As we look at the report, do you think we have to take out this 51% of production costs and substitute a percentage of the actual content? We had a recommendation at committee—I believe it was 51% of content. So that's my first question, as we come to the close of this debate.
The other one is this. We have talked about voluntary and compulsory. You mentioned GM labelling. We know there has been a voluntary GM labelling law in force since 2004 and nobody's really taken us up on it. If it's compulsory, should there be an incentive for industry to do this? You get a law in place and there has to be some kind of help, whether it is subsidies or something. That's the second question.
I did not realize that in Saskatchewan, for example, it is not necessary to label where apples are from. I always assumed, when I was in a store, that the apples were a product of B.C., Ontario, or something. I didn't realize that it wasn't right across the country. I would like a comment on that.
Finally, we should address the whole idea of food sovereignty, food security. Should we be promoting “Canadian” to ensure that we support our local agriculture?