Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you very much for your presentations. For those of you who do not understand French, I invite you to avail yourselves of the interpretation.
Mr. Doering, you are correct in saying that you have sounded a discordant note. That is not uninteresting, far from it in fact. However, your testimony does raise several questions.
You argue that the legislation must not be amended because doing so would have some dramatic repercussions. Of course, you mentioned the potential domino effect of more stringent guidelines governing the use of the “Product of Canada” designation.
You spoke of some thirty regulations arising from the Competition Bureau guideline. Can you give us some examples of the repercussions that amending the act could have?