Mr. Steckle, I said there was a two-step easy process. One, I would move the 51% higher to get rid of those egregious cases, like where people brought the famous jar of garlic. So if it had to be over 80%, it would probably be harder—that kind of business.
The fish example was a good one. Fish caught in international waters, filleted in China, and brought to Canada, which assumed all the main production costs, should maybe still be a “Product of Canada”, certainly not a product of any other place.
The second step is to encourage the Canadian producers to do it. As I say, “Just do it” .