Two things are important in that regard. One of those is that we provide sufficient time for those who have an interest—the public, industry, consumer groups, industry associations—to express their views so they can be taken into account. So consultation and communication, as my colleague has noted, will have to be an important part so we have the benefit of those views.
Once on the basis of that input we are in a position to then advance a change in terms of policy, then it will also be important to provide sufficient time in terms of implementation for the industry to adjust. As you can imagine, processors will have a stock of labels they are currently using. There will be product on the shelf, which will have to be permitted sufficient time to exit the market as new labels come into use. So there will need to be consideration of what is an appropriate time to allow for effective implementation in a manner that doesn't disrupt the industry unnecessarily.
I certainly can't tell you what the perfect time is in that regard. We will be listening with interest to the industry in terms of what time they believe they will need to make adjustments, while still keeping very much in our thoughts the very strong interest that exists in moving to review and make adjustments to policy on the basis of what we hear through the consultative process. So I can't give you an absolute time, but I can be clear that the time will be determined by effective consultation and an effective period of implementation that will allow the orderly adjustment to any change in policy.