I have a final couple of comments.
If what you're saying, Guy, and what Brian and Larry have said reflects what you folks are saying over there, I don't think you get it. I don't think you understand.
It's not that I'm against what the Prime Minister is doing, but we have a democratic process. We have an all-party committee, and on this issue we will probably come out with a report where we're not even disagreeing on a lot of issues. It's the fact that somewhere in this announcement it could have been mentioned that “I, as Prime Minister, support the work of the committee”.
Why wasn't the chair at that announcement? Why wasn't James there on behalf of us, and why wasn't he getting some credit as our chair: “This is the committee. They're doing the work. Let's recognize this, and let's make this a priority for us. We've gone through the democratic process. They've brought in witnesses, and we're going to look very closely and we're going to make the report a priority.” That's all we're saying.
I personally feel that regardless of what you say, what we're doing is irrelevant. That's how I feel. I want that for the record. I think there has to be some kind of recommendation coming out of this discussion to the minister and Prime Minister to reflect this.