Perhaps I can answer Larry's question, because I was involved in that fairly extensively.
What was put in place by the previous government, Larry, was a tobacco reduction strategy. It was agreed on by the industry and the government. Even though the member from the area, who was the Minister of Agriculture, had made that commitment and lost the election, the government still followed through on the commitment he had made.
So we paid out that money on the basis of a tobacco reduction strategy. Clearly it didn't move to a complete exit strategy. It wasn't thought that this was required at the time. Circumstances have since changed.