I have just one last question, Mr. Chair.
Is my understanding correct, then, that by the way this motion reads, if there were a counterbalancing policy on initiatives that would hold the line, so to speak—as you say vis-à-vis their America competitors—with whatever it might be on a litre of diesel fuel, and there were another program, whether it's an income tax cut or a research incentive, or whatever...? Am I led to believe that as long as this leaves us competitive vis-à-vis the United States, or in a better position, it would meet the conditions of this motion?