Okay. Well, I'm clarifying that part of the reason for the motion that is on the table is so that you get to a report dealing with the consequences of the secret report. Once you've decided that, you're going to do a report that will eventually get to the House of Commons, and then you call witnesses. It seems appropriate to me to first deal with the motion, and then the committee is dealing with the report of substance, of which the first two witnesses would be the CFIA and PIPSC.
On August 18th, 2008. See this statement in context.