No, that is not accurate. Our proposal is that we maintain BSE surveillance and activities. When we undertook our BSE surveillance program, designed in 2003 on the enhanced program, we identified at that time the need to achieve approximately 30,000 samples per year to achieve our objective of having a very credible system, in line with international standards. You will be well aware from our previous appearances at the committee that in fact we are achieving about double that level of testing over the five years subsequent to the detection of BSE. Our undertaking, through assessing our BSE information that we've gathered and analyzed over the five years since we started our BSE program, has identified to us that we can continue to better target those animals that have the highest possibility of contracting BSE.
In doing that, it would mean we would no longer be testing animals that don't have the potential to find BSE, as is currently the case in some elements of our program.