As far as the Uruguay Round commitments in amber spending go, we have about $4.5 billion and we're currently spending just under $2 billion, so we would have lots of room there.
As far as equity is concerned, the point CFA members make is that some provinces are already spending their own money on companion programs. Federal dollars would give other provinces the opportunity to seed companion programs, and it would put those provinces on a more level footing with the ones that are already spending money on companion programs.
We're absolutely not suggesting that the entire BRM package should be block funding. We are saying there are some areas where components of provincial-specific programs would address needs more adequately than the national program, simply because of the variation in agriculture. Our goal is not to create inequity.
Let me use the example of Saskatchewan and Alberta. If Saskatchewan received some federal dollars, that would at least give them the impetus to do something in the province so there wouldn't be that equity problem. The problem between Saskatchewan and Alberta is almost as bad as the problem we had in the past between Canadian producers and U.S. producers. We're saying in that case it could help to get closer to that equity.