Sorry, I haven't read that report, so I'm not exactly sure what that refers to. We don't support the concept of AgriFlex only because Ontario supports it.
I should say one thing. We don't support the federal government's flowing money into a province and letting them do, willy-nilly, what they want to do with the money. First of all, it should be contingent on the province also putting in their contribution, their 40¢ contribution. Second, there should be accountability, that the money is being used in a constructive way to deal with either a BRM need or a non-BRM need in a way that continues to try to achieve the national objectives that have been set through the national programs.
I can't comment on the Ontario ministry. I can comment on the RMP that has been suggested, and I believe they're doing that—