In terms of what the cattle industry has recommended, it was a per head advance, as you indicated, for 2004. Not to discount it, we have identified that there are risks with a per head advance, as there were in 2004. When we did a similar type of advance in 2004, we ended up with tens of millions of dollars of overpayments; producers ended up in an overpayment situation. What we're trying to do is use the new suite of programs to get the money that's available under the new suite out as quickly as possible.
We are working through a government-industry task team to look at what other gaps and what other options there are to also flow money to producers, for instance, under the federal advance payment program. They have specifically asked for a per head advance, and we have raised the concern that when we did this last time we ended up with lots of overpayments under the program, because the per head advance isn't tied directly to how we calculate the final entitlement under the program.
So we are working through an industry government task team to look at what options we have in addition to accelerating what's available today.