What I'm saying is that the amendment is not a valid amendment. It's not a movable amendment because it negates the substance of the original motion.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
February 3rd, 2009 / 12:25 p.m.
Conservative
Brian Storseth Conservative WestlockâSt. Paul, AB
What I'm saying is that the amendment is not a valid amendment. It's not a movable amendment because it negates the substance of the original motion.
See context to find out what was said next.