To go from there, André, even five or six witnesses at ten minutes each takes up the biggest part of an hour. I guess I'm going to have to put a bit of faith in it. I'm going to try to keep them moving as much as possible. It's important to hear from our witnesses, and we certainly don't want to make it look, intentional or otherwise, like we don't want to hear what they have to say. We want to be fair. It's for the sake of time and allowing as many questions as possible.
I don't think ten in an hour meeting has ever happened before, and it probably won't happen again. Having ten in two one-hour meetings would probably be an extreme.
Is there any further discussion on that issue?
(Motion agreed to)