Well, yes, but my point is this.... The other one that I should raise is the product-of-Canada definition, which the Prime Minister's office imposed over the wishes of this committee. That also needs to be looked at closely. We recommended 85%. The Prime Minister overruled that and went to 98%. Now we've made the problem even worse in that Canadian product cannot be labelled product of Canada because of either sugars or sauces that go into it. So we need to deal with some of those issues as well, and I think they're of a more immediate concern than some of the issues on the motion.
So my question to you is this. On all the issues that come forward, including these motions, how are we going to prioritize this so that the committee itself decides which are the first issues to be looked at?