The motion is pretty simple and straightforward, Mr. Chair. I do note that in today's media maybe Minister Day is taking a little more aggressive stance with the United States on this issue.
The motion is that in relation to its study of country-of-origin labelling, COOL, the committee invite officials from the Canadian embassy in Washington and the United States embassy in Ottawa to meet with the committee in order to discuss the United States country-of-origin legislation and its impact on Canadian livestock and other agricultural exports. I so move.
Just as background, I think all parties--quite a number of ministers in fact--have done a lot of work on this issue, trying to impress upon the United States how serious the country-of-origin labelling is. It's something that's been worked on for a number of years, even through the Canada-U.S. Interparliamentary Association. I know I've met a number of senators and congressmen, including the chair of the U.S. congressional agriculture committee, and I think they understand our position, at least at the political and administrative level, but I do find that they don't at the diplomatic level.
I think Ambassador Wilson has been pushing this issue and understands it. If they will come, we do need to express at the diplomatic level how serious this issue is for Canadian producers, and how serious it is in terms of our trading relationship with the United States. It gives us an opportunity to hear from them what they have to say, and for us to impress upon them how serious this issue is for Canadian producers.
The most integrated industry in North America was the cattle industry. A lot of producers are being hurt, especially in Canada, as a result of this COOL legislation.