I don't understand why that's inconsistent. If we have lower productivity in Canada than the U.S. does, and they have cheaper labour, those are two reasons why they have an advantage over us, not one. They may have cheaper labour. That depends on the industry, whether they have cheaper labour or not. But if they also have higher productivity and we don't try to match their productivity, we have two strikes, not one, against us.
Secondly, with the number of things that should have happened in trade agreements, for example, we should be able to level the playing field to some extent, on things like the regulatory environment, that would keep out products that have different inputs on them that are not allowed here or are not healthy.
So I'm sorry, but I think my argument is totally consistent, especially given the fact that we have a huge land resource in Canada that is, I think, the second largest in the world for human beings. We can't eat everything in Canada that we produce here, so we have to be able to compete in the world.