I'm sorry, I'm not sure I fully understand your question, but if you're asking whether or not we have a say as to how a company would decide to allocate its profits then clearly that's not the issue.
But I think you're really asking if you have a situation where as a result of a merger the combined entity would be able to significantly depress the prices it pays to its suppliers, whether they be cattle suppliers or other types of suppliers, to shift, if you will, the margin that's available in respect of that product, more to themselves than away, to the point where the price gets depressed significantly below the competitive level.
That very issue was the focus in both the Better Beef-Cargill and XL-Lakeside transactions. We spent quite a bit of time looking at that issue, and what we heard from farmers and from other participants in the industry is that packers that were located in the midwestern and northwestern United States were competitive alternatives for the supply of cattle. So when you're looking at the relevant geographic market, you can't just confine it to western Canada; you also have to include these other competitive alternatives. Obviously MCOOL may have an impact upon that possibility, but that was the information. We also saw significant cattle flows south of the border.