Apparently that's the case, but I have to add that it's even more bizarre than that. This truly has happened.
We've sold trees to forest companies who were forest companies when we sold the trees to them, and I'm sure you've read this in British Columbia. Most forest companies have been allowed to sell those forest-licensed lands now for real estate. So the trees that were planted on them, even though ostensibly we thought they were going for reforestation, they were going to land beautification and landscaping for a real estate project. But we don't get to retroactively go back and say “Hey, wait a second, the end-user changed his purpose for those trees.” We're not in control of what the end-user does with the trees once they've left our farm, so it's even more than that.
But yes, in answer to your question.