I have some agreement with Pierre. We talked about this motion in committee, and it's too broad, but it's not that it's not important. I think there are over 20 meetings we can have this spring, and only 13 or 14 that are filled up. So I think it's not a bad motion, but it's just too broad. If it is brought back here when we get through this, we can look into it, but I think it has to be more focused on where we are going on this. Is it more WTO? Where is it at, and where is it going? As it stands now, I think it is too broad and it's unacceptable, but that is not to say it is not something we should be looking into in the future.
On February 12th, 2009. See this statement in context.