It goes to my point that we do not know who the witnesses were. All we've seen is a report, which, at the end of the day, supposedly could have been edited by those witnesses.
Again, it goes to the heart of this government: secrecy and cover-up. That's why I oppose this motion. We don't know what happened.
I think her report is very good in terms of some of its recommendations. But we really don't know in full context what the witnesses said. We don't know if 20 of them maybe called for a public inquiry and she just didn't put that in, because she was under pressure to report to the minister, who would make the decision whether or not the report would be made public.
So again, it goes to the heart of this government: secrecy, lack of transparency—and, I would submit, a cover-up.