It sounds as if the decision basically is one on paper, where, obviously, if cars aren't being loaded, the sites aren't needed. Yet the argument is that there's a slow increase in cars and we have to look at the future, because once a site is delisted, you can't reactivate it. That's my understanding.
My other question is a practical one. Let's say there are 39 stations that have loaded no cars for the past three years. If Cam or somebody else suddenly wanted to use one of these sites in the next week, would he have access? What's the procedure? Is it automatic that if a farmer wants one of these sites now it's just a matter of ordering the car? Then the car will be there and he can bring his auger with him and make his inspection. Or are there some complications?
I'm asking because, Cam, you mentioned that groups tried to enter into commercial agreements but were met with some antagonism and a lack of cooperation. I want to see if in fact it's now a smooth system for even these sites that are potentially going to be delisted.