Let me be clear. The notice is for 60 days, but we never said that we would just give the notice and then disappear; we wanted to speak to the communities. So, in the weeks before and after the notice that we gave, we met 100 different municipalities, mayors and general managers, to discuss the issues. The communities were not just informed through a simple notice; we communicated with them in order to explain that their line had not been used for three years and that it was our intention to give notice and to no longer use it. It is not up to me to comment on the legislation as it stands today. We complied with it, and we even went beyond it. It is important to us to ensure that the communities understand what we are doing. We did not just put notices in newspapers. It is up to legislators to decide whether that notice period should be longer.
You have to understand that the situation is somewhat different in urban areas. The lines are often longer and they can therefore be used for commuter trains or other services. In this case, the only use for the line is to serve wheat producers. There is no other use. The legislator can decide whether 60 days are sufficient or not, but rest assured that the notice is not the only thing we do. We took appropriate steps to communicate with communities; they were told what was happening, even though, after 60 days, we could have just delisted them.