Thank you.
Your time has expired, Mr. Hoback.
I'd like to continue with this discussion just a little bit before we move to our next round. I was going to ask about this anyway because of Mr. Easter's question.
I'm not clear on this, Mr. Ruest, especially with the testimony that Mr. Goff just gave. It still appears that if a farmer brings in, say, 25 tonnes, for the sake of argument, and puts it on a car, and it gets to Vancouver or Churchill or wherever it's going and then there are only 20 tonnes or 18 tonnes or whatever, there's no reimbursement in place without basically making the farmer do the equivalent of swimming the English Channel.
You led me to believe that basically it was all looked after, but I'm kind of wondering.