To add a further comment to that, Mr. Atamanenko, I think what it really comes down to is that it's all about risk management—the risk in terms of legal liabilities, the risk of potential future incidents, and regulatory compliance. Everything is about risk management, and that comes at a cost.
There has been a steady downloading of risk and liability from the manufacturing sector right through to the retail sector. And what is the retail sector? We're a flow-through. We buy and then sell, and hopefully in that process there's a margin to survive on and feed our kids with. That's all we're doing. But if we have to bear all the risk, that's dysfunctional and not possible.
The answer for many of my members is going to be no, that they will not assume that risk. You can't demand that they assume that risk or be the only place where the buck stops. That's why they exit and hand the keys to their manufacturers. That's why they walk away, why they drop the product. This is why it's happening.
If we think that's acceptable, then let's continue doing what we're doing, which is nothing. We're not the type of sector that is looking for the government to literally babysit us and every time we get a scratch to put a band-aid on us. I don't think we've ever come to you with anything, other than this issue, for three years. We have warned you of the consequences. They are unfolding and are happening.
So we're not playing the boy who cried wolf. I think we're bringing you a highly credible problem that is now playing out in front of us, just as we predicted.