On that, Alex, as far as a timeline is concerned, that's certainly discussion for the committee, and I'm not going to speak on that.
As far as the specific subjects within that go, that would I think probably be a precedent. For example, competitiveness, yes, is wide-ranging, but there was never at the start of it...and I'm just using it because it's a recent example. There was nothing ever put in there except when it came to the members submitting their different witness lists. The categories within that sorted themselves out.
My observation would be that as the witnesses come in, the committee can decide its own fate and destiny, so you can basically decide that as you go along. It's just a comment more than anything.
It is 5:15, and at the start of the meeting I stated that the meeting would be over. It would be my suggestion at the next meeting that we move on to the same speakers' list when we move into business and go from there.
This meeting is adjourned until Tuesday, November 3.