I'll try to quickly explain.
The situation is that we have some material that we process in the regular rendering process, but we've had to build two plants instead of one under the same roof, so the high-risk material goes into a new line and the product that comes out.... Our role is, as it were, as a service industry, and we try to have low costs and to bring value, but the problem with the protein that comes out of the SRM is that it needs to be destroyed, so it has negative value. As long as this regulation is in place, that's how we're going to service our customers.
We operate plants in the U.S. also, and there it would be the same cost if it were the same regulation, but it's a very different regulation. The volumes per head required to be removed are extremely low compared to the Canadian numbers, and the way they have to remove it is very different also. It also affects the deadstock collection where it is possible in the U.S. to continue to collect deadstock and remove certain parts that are, let's say, easily removed, as opposed to parts on the Canadian list, which cannot be removed effectively from a dead animal.
And yes, we are a service industry. We create value by adding value to the finished product, but as long as our customers require us to remove certain parts and those parts need to be destroyed and there's massive investment.... Our company, for example, has invested $15 million just to have a separate line, and right now we're looking at investing $8 million into something that would, let's say, create value, but in fact it would simply diminish the cost of disposing of the protein to get closer to a zero cost basis.