I would love to comment on that, certainly from our point of view. On this whole issue you mentioned around the subsidy on corn in the United States, of course, I feed some pigs down in the United States as well as in the Maritimes, and there are certain things we do to be competitive with what they do down there. But the hardest thing to compete with is the dollar-a-bushel subsidy on corn. Alex mentioned it too. Sometimes we feel a little bit guilty, and I will say we are probably one of the commodities that are very concerned about subsidies and this whole issue about trade access and countervailing duties. On the other hand, it's so frustrating when we complain to the Americans and say, look, it doesn't matter what we do; what's important is what you do, and if you do it wrong, then we'll put a countervailing duty on you. But I would go on to say that I think around this table certainly there's a lot of history of all parties working together to try to fix some of these issues, and that has been alluded to before.
These issues around some of the programs that we have could be fixed, such as the negative margin test that Wayne mentioned, the issue with AgriInvest and trying to do something with our margins, going forward from here. We talked a lot about trying to get our producers through this crisis, and that's our first priority right now, but once we get through this, we have a lot of issues when our producers can't pass the negative margin test, when the CAIS program or the AgriStability program isn't going to be there to help our producers and keep them in business. I will tell you, if we lose all our good producers, there's going to be pretty cheap barley on the Island and a lot of other places. We're going to have to rebuild the railroads on the Prairies to haul all the grain away, because there won't be pigs there to eat it.